{"id":10677,"date":"2026-01-27T15:47:59","date_gmt":"2026-01-27T14:47:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gmintegrarrhh.com\/?p=10677"},"modified":"2026-01-28T10:17:32","modified_gmt":"2026-01-28T09:17:32","slug":"why-many-workplace-harassment-protocols-fail-an-inspection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gmintegrarrhh.com\/en\/why-many-workplace-harassment-protocols-fail-an-inspection\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Many Workplace Harassment Protocols Fail an Inspection"},"content":{"rendered":"

In recent years, the workplace harassment protocol has become one of the documents most frequently reviewed by the Labour Inspectorate.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, in practice, many of the protocols in place within companies do not pass even a basic review: they are generic, incomplete, not applied, or simply do not comply with current legal requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

Having \u201ca protocol stored in a drawer\u201d is no longer enough. <\/span>Regulations require it to be real, operational, known by the workforce, and aligned with current legislation<\/b>. When this is not the case, the consequences may include financial penalties, labour disputes, and a serious loss of internal credibility.<\/span><\/p>\n

In this article, we analyse <\/span>why so many workplace harassment protocols fail an inspection<\/b>, the most common mistakes, and what the law currently requires for them to be considered valid.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"EQUALITY<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n

Tabla de contenido<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n